Your firm does not run on Excel.It runs on 40 versions of Excel.
Drop the staffing file, the budget file and the tracker exactly as they are. A model reads them the way a good analyst would, reconciles them, and returns your steering committee pack — live link, pack PDF and editable deck.
Merged cells, dead tabs, three spellings of the same consultant, a #REF! hiding in the revenue total. The mess is the input, not something to fix first. Every number we could not resolve is named rather than guessed.
The first pack is free: up to 3 files, one full pack, no card, no account. Your work email is asked for once, at the end, after the pack exists. Or read a finished pack first.
Drop your staffing, budget and tracker files
Mess included. Up to 3 files, .xlsx .xlsm .xls .csv
Encrypted at rest · never used to train models · deletable anytime · what happens to your files
- 1 day
- a week a 30-person firm spends producing information it already has
- 40+
- versions of the same numbers across staffing, budget and tracker files
- 4 min
- target time from dropping files to reading the first finding
- 0
- columns to map, tools to learn, or migrations to sit through
Forty versions of the truth, reconciled by hand on Thursday night.
Every week someone opens the staffing file, the budget file, the tracker, and the copy a colleague made just in case. The numbers disagree. Nobody sees the consultant booked at 130% or the project at −22.7% until close. This is what a firm actually drops on us, verbatim.
budget_Q1_v2.xlsx
Tracker - copie.xlsx
Allocation_JUIN_do_not_send.xlsm
timesheets_extract_20260318.xls
projects_master.csv
No tool wants to touch input like this. A suite requires the mess to have been cleaned up before it arrives, and a BI layer breaks the moment a column moves. We treat the mess as permanent.
A model reads your files. Then it says what it found.
It infers what each tab and column means, reconciles people and projects across files, recomputes margin and allocation, and flags what it cannot resolve instead of guessing. Between 60 and 180 seconds. You can close the tab; the pack finishes anyway.
Nobody has to change how they work, so there is nothing to adopt and nothing that can fail to be adopted. Next cycle, drop the same files with new numbers and regenerate.
- 0:04Reading 6 sources
- 0:31Reconciling names and projects2 findings
- 1:12Checking formulas and margins4 findings
- 1:48Building your pack4 findings · 2 unresolved
No spinner. Named steps, honest ticks, and a findings counter that rises while it works.
The pack your steering committee walks in with.
One live link, one PDF you can send today, one editable deck for your own template. Firm and cycle at the top, four figures, the portfolio, allocation, then the findings.
Meridian Consulting Group
Week of 18 Mar · 6 sources · generated 18 Mar 2026
- Active projects
- 6
- Portfolio margin
- 2.3%
- Projects at risk
- 1
- Findings
- 4
| Project | Lead | Revenue | Margin | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora Migration | S. Laurent | $412,000 | 18.4% | On track |
| Helix Rollout | M. Adeyemi | $268,500 | 11.2% | On track |
| Security Review | P. Nair | $96,000 | −22.7% | At risk |
| Northwind PMO | S. Laurent | $180,000 | 6.9% | On track |
| Ledger Cutover | J. Okonkwo | $221,750 | 2.1% | Watch |
| Atlas Discovery | M. Adeyemi | $105,600 | 9.8% | On track |
Two spellings, two files, one consultant. Merged, the number is 130%.
The flagging is the product, as much as the consolidation.
“These two names are the same person, and she is at 130%” is a finding a partner will pay for, and no suite will ever produce it — because a suite needs the mess cleaned up before it arrives. One sentence per finding, with the sources it came from.
“Sarah Laurent” and “S. Laurent” are one person — booked at 130% across 2 files.
A #REF! in Budget!H42 broke your revenue total. Recomputed portfolio revenue: $1,283,850.
Security Review is at −22.7% margin, the third cycle in a row.
3 projects in the tracker have no budget line, so they carried 0 weight in the margin as reported.
What we refused to guess is written down and asked as a plain question. Answer it or skip it; the pack is delivered either way, and the answer is remembered for every future cycle.
- Two Budget tabs disagree by $18,400. Which one is current — Budget or Budget_new?
- Is “Nair P.” in the tracker the same person as “P. Nair” in staffing?
What everything else asks of you first.
The real incumbent is not a suite. It is the analyst rebuilding the same deck on Thursday, plus the freelance PMO consultant a firm pays €800 a day to build it again.
| Approach | What it asks of you first | Where it stops |
|---|---|---|
| An ERP or professional-services suite | Months of implementation, data entry and change management | The first report arrives after the rollout, if the rollout lands |
| Power BI or a consolidation tool | Clean, stable inputs and a schema that never moves | It breaks the week a column moves or someone saves a new version |
| A generic spreadsheet AI tool | One tidy file and a prompt | You get a chart, not the pack a partner reads |
| The analyst on Thursday night | One consultant-day a week, forever | Too busy reconciling to notice the 130% booking or the −22.7% project |
| Operations Cell | The files you already have, exactly as they are | It does not stop at a chart: link, PDF and editable deck, with the unresolved named |
One payment. Not a subscription.
Start at one reporting month, or take the quarter that matches how firms budget and how steering committees run. Prices are stated here and stated again before any payment.
First pack
- One full pack: dashboard, PDF and deck
- Findings and unresolved items included
- No account, no configuration, no call
Pack Pass
- One reporting month: this pack, kept and regenerated
- Editable pack deck and unlimited sources
- The findings log across every cycle in the window
- The smallest yes — one month, one payment
Firm Pass
- Unlimited sources and unlimited packs for one firm
- Portfolio dashboard, pack PDF and editable pack deck
- Regenerate every cycle; the findings log is kept
- About 13 reporting cycles — under $100 a cycle
Partner Pass
- Everything in the Firm Pass
- Multiple entities and teams
- Your own report template applied to the pack
- Priority handling of file formats we do not yet read
A pass is bought from inside your own pack, once you have read it — never before. Every pass is one payment, not a subscription. Questions go to ope@nanocorp.app and a person answers.
Drop the mess. Read the findings.
No migration, no implementation, no column mapping, and nothing for your team to learn. The first pack exists before any commitment does.
The drop zone takes files, not a signup. Nothing is charged on the first pack, and there is no waitlist to join.
- We never keep the spreadsheet itself: it is read in memory and discarded.
- What we do keep is encrypted at rest and never used to train models.
- One button deletes every source and every consolidation immediately, and states exactly what went. Written confirmation from ope@nanocorp.app on request.
- Packs already produced stay readable, even after a Pass ends.